Today's hottest deals

Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive25.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X58  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 16 '19 at 19:21
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5649
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 97.4
1-Core 101
2-Core 196
78% 131 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 621
63% 512 Pts
64-Core 755
47% 755 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.3% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 112
Parallax 100
85% 105 fps
MRender 94.7
Gravity 97.8
Splatting 92
77% 94.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 40 66 25 30 47 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.7% Poor
Read 162
Write 90.3
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 58.9
22% 97 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 10.1
42% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 13.8
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 52.9
46% 63.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
613GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 158 167 174 174 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 169
Mixed 38
SusWrite 168
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 18
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 13.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 48.7
82% 48.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,709 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback