Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory19.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 19.5GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory7.9 GB free of 19.5313 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1666 x 927 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140520
Uptime19.6 Days
Run DateSep 18 '19 at 21:45
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
32.6% Below average
Memory 38.8
1-Core 38.6
2-Core 75.4
30% 50.9 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 286
25% 215 Pts
64-Core 618
38% 618 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 1GB
Driver: vm3dum64.dll Ver. 8.14.1.51
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.66% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 0.38
Parallax 0.28
1% 0.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.66%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 256GB
178GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 115 107 86 79 83 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.6% Below average
Read 525
Write 221
Mixed 258
SusWrite 98.7
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 7.6
26% 7.87 MB/s
DQ Read 38.6
DQ Write 36.6
DQ Mixed 37.6
28% 37.6 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 69%
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 256GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 116 137 157 115 142 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 53% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 19GB
null MHz
16384, 2048, 1024, 512, 32 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 23.5
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 208
19% 208 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback