Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire ES1-512

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire ES1-512  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire ES1-512
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141024
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 20 '19 at 18:31
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N3540
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 25.3
2-Core 49.9
32% 45.4 Pts
4-Core 91.2
8-Core 93.8
12% 92.5 Pts
64-Core 100
6% 100 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Acer(1025 0936) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3574
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.4% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 1.03
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 2
1% 1.26 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.4%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$38
790GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 89 76 78 76 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 93.3
Write 88.5
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 78.9
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 62%
USB FLASH DRIVE 4GB
2GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
2.76% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 4.3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 4
7% 6.32 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.76%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
21.3% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire ES1-512 Builds (Compare 469 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire ES1-512

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback