Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '19 at 11:27
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 265
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 692
74% 590 Pts
64-Core 690
43% 690 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Lighting 73.1
Reflection 72.7
Parallax 64.7
60% 70.1 fps
MRender 74.4
Gravity 66.5
Splatting 56.8
53% 65.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
670GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH4400RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 19 180 3.8 34 4.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
46% Average
Read 449
Write 387
Mixed 314
SusWrite 56.7
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 15.3
66% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 91.7
DQ Mixed 29.9
43% 79.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46%
Great: 58%
Corsair Force 120GB
111GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 92 87 79 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 156
Write 127
Mixed 137
SusWrite 88.3
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 35.5
135% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 111
89% 125 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 56%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
60GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 129 128 129 129 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 348
Write 224
Mixed 257
SusWrite 128
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 56.3
186% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 171
129% 174 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
169GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 129 129 130 129 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 349
Write 186
Mixed 227
SusWrite 128
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 51.6
178% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 133
109% 156 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 118%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
543GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 83 84 85 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 66.2
Write 62.3
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 83.8
49% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 59%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0711
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 19 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 38
Write 34.2
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 19.8
22% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 103%
ASMT 2115 1TB
760GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 19 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 13.7
Mixed 28
SusWrite 18.5
30% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C9D3/8GX 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1866C9 KHX1866C9D3/8GX 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1866C9 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.5% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18.1
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 1,189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 7 - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $823
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback