Today's hottest deals

Asrockrack EPC602D8A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrockrack EPC602D8A  (all builds)
Memory121.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141030
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 29 '19 at 14:10
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 178
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 666
57% 490 Pts
64-Core 860
53% 860 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
Gigabyte(1458 376A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2862 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 186
Parallax 203
116% 177 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 183
Splatting 132
120% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 487GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 372 371 363 353 351 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 1,029
Write 659
Mixed 490
SusWrite 372
142% 638 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 33.2
117% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 402
DQ Mixed 337
265% 363 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 117%
Great: 214%
Fsa128gm W-S8 128GB
82GB free
Firmware: S8FM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 188 190 191 189 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 451
Write 192
Mixed 207
SusWrite 189
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 18.4
72% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 68.4
76% 127 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 58%
Transcend SSD370 128GB-$74
119GB free
Firmware: N081
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 153 154 153 152 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 450
Write 154
Mixed 206
SusWrite 153
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 25.3
87% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 152
127% 186 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 83%
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
165GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 299 348 136 210 212 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 448
Write 425
Mixed 406
SusWrite 248
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 30.6
102% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 247
195% 270 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2K70CM0- 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.5% Very good
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 28
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EPC602D8A Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrockrack EPC602D8A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $495
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback