Today's hottest deals

HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory43.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '22 at 10:29
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 76
2-Core 144
58% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 568
52% 436 Pts
64-Core 771
48% 771 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 112
Parallax 128
100% 121 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 116
Splatting 106
107% 136 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 296 301 313 306 302 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 452
Write 395
Mixed 260
SusWrite 314
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 33.8
124% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 159
163% 267 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 114%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
506GB free
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 248 249 251 251 245 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
79.1% Very good
Read 251
Write 236
Mixed 240
SusWrite 249
55% 244 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 44.1
144% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 198
149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 133%
Hitachi HUP722020APA330 2TB
121GB free
Firmware: A36C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 69 70 71 70 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 97
Write 103
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 69.3
60% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 71%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$89
406GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 115 119 119 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 123
Write 119
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 118
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70BH0-CK0 6x8GB
6 of 8 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
69.5% Good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 26
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,503 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback