Today's hottest deals

Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER C15B
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150108
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 04 '19 at 17:18
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4712MQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 179
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 286
36% 276 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Device(1B0A 2109) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.01% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 6.84
3% 7 fps
MRender 9.67
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.96
6% 6.66 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.01%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE 240GB-$85
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFC12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 183 174 181 122 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 489
Write 461
Mixed 383
SusWrite 193
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 30.9
117% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 206
188% 286 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$39
481GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 104 106 104 104 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 105
Write 41.5
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 100
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
65% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 62%
Generic- Multi-Card 128GB
107GB free, PID 0138
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 18.8
Write 16.9
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 18.8
25% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 3.2
209% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
54.4% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.8
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 14.9
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback