Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110N-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H110N
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110N-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 06 '19 at 17:48
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$45
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 195
80% 135 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 323
43% 320 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.1% Excellent
Lighting 99.2
Reflection 108
Parallax 102
81% 103 fps
MRender 96.4
Gravity 94.4
Splatting 96.9
79% 95.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 120GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 140 132 127 123 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 425
Write 417
Mixed 352
SusWrite 161
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 50
172% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 350
265% 357 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 112%
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
20GB free
Firmware: 4PC10362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 126 131 129 131 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
42% Average
Read 228
Write 130
Mixed 138
SusWrite 129
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 19.1
65% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 74.1
DQ Mixed 63.8
58% 91.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42%
Great: 48%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
814GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 68 67 68 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 86.2
Write 84.5
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 67.4
54% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 55%
H/W DISK 1 1.5TB
979GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 4.4 2.3 3.8 1.1 0.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.4% Poor
Read 115
Write 114
Mixed 59
SusWrite 4.5
91% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 36%
H/W DISK 2 1TB
722GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 115 117 116 118 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 187
Write 162
Mixed 68
SusWrite 115
170% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 53%
H/W DISK 3 500GB
463GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 118 117 118 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 130
Write 131
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 117
145% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GB-$67
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
74.7% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22.9
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 23.4
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110N-CF Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110N-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback