Today's hottest deals

MSI Z77A-G45 (MS-7752)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7752
MotherboardMSI Z77A-G45 (MS-7752)  (all builds)
Memory17.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120619
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateNov 19 '21 at 16:53
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 184
76% 128 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 539
55% 443 Pts
64-Core 561
35% 561 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Zotac(19DA 1471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2790 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 472.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.2% Good
Lighting 69.7
Reflection 83.2
Parallax 75.3
57% 76.1 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 105
Splatting 81.2
70% 85.1 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 471
Write 430
Mixed 335
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 55.5
184% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 369
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
886GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 37 36 34 264 331 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 489
Write 440
Mixed 404
SusWrite 157
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 26
125% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 41
89% 177 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 99%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
391GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 49 46 48 49 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 80
Write 87.5
Mixed 57
SusWrite 47.6
50% 68 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 62%
H/W DISK 1 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.9 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 34.2
Write 28.3
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 3.4
29% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 61%
H/W DISK 2 1TB
197GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 22 22 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 21.5
Mixed 29
SusWrite 23.1
35% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 53%
H/W DISK 3 3TB
890GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 34
Write 26.8
Mixed 28
SusWrite 0.4
28% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 50%
H/W DISK 4 10TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.9% Very poor
Read 34
Write 28.5
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 0.3
29% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
159% 2.87 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 17.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77A-G45 (MS-7752) Builds (Compare 1,262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI Z77A-G45 (MS-7752)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback