Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '22 at 04:55
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 72
1-Core 76
2-Core 153
59% 100 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 386
42% 332 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Device(1545 0560) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.4.1
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 25.8
Parallax 28.5
15% 24.3 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 22.8
19% 23.7 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 410 413 417 412 394 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 431
Mixed 422
SusWrite 405
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 42.2
139% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 232
176% 238 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
569GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 110 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 99.4
Write 103
Mixed 67
SusWrite 109
70% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.5% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback