Today's hottest deals

Colorful iGame Z270 Ymir

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemColorful iGame Z270 Ymir  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful iGame Z270 YMIR
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170417
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 07 '19 at 13:30
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 241
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 668
66% 537 Pts
64-Core 675
42% 675 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Gigabyte(1458 375F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 141
Parallax 134
107% 136 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 139
Splatting 107
97% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful CN600S 240GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0802C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 164 386 740 585 197 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 1,341
Write 1,187
Mixed 490
SusWrite 426
191% 861 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 17.5
112% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 726
DQ Write 58.4
DQ Mixed 21.1
109% 268 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 129%
Great: 204%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$27
260GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 124 125 125 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 134
Write 122
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 125
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown iGame DDR4 8G 3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.3% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 12.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 14.7
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback