HP EliteBook 850 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP EliteBook 850 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8079
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '19 at 21:51
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 17%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 182
64% 114 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 249
35% 258 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 8079) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6888
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.5% Terrible
Lighting 5.97
Reflection 9.31
Parallax 5.84
5% 7.04 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 5.93
Splatting 0.04
4% 5.36 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.5%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN512HCJH-000H1 512GB
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT22H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 384 417 414 411 413 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 325
Mixed 267
SusWrite 401
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 38
138% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 273
226% 324 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB Kingston 9905624-026.A00G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.3% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 22.8
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 850 G3 Builds (Compare 1,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 850 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback