Today's hottest deals

Asus K53SC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus K53SC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K53SC
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '19 at 05:39
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 84.2
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 92.3
55% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 173
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 1682) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
2% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 3.42
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.36 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.17
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JEDOA60A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 57 57 54 54 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 72.2
Mixed 38
SusWrite 55.7
43% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-045.A00LF Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K53SC Builds (Compare 287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K53SC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $106
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback