Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A85X-UP4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A85X-UP4  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120831
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 19 '16 at 10:54
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 90
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 121
58% 91.7 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 207
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
Asus(1043 03EA) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.41% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 9.19
Parallax 7.34
8% 8.61 fps
MRender 9.48
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 9.61
7% 8.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.41%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0309
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 504
Write 194
Mixed 284
72% 327 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 7.99
76% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 12.8
39% 84.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 72%
Seagate ST96812AS 60GB
6GB free
Firmware: 3.14
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 36.8
Write 37.9
Mixed 35.8
28% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.31
75% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A186 CMZ8GX3M2A186 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A85X-UP4 Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A85X-UP4 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $338
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback