Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130201
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 24 '19 at 18:16
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47% Average
Memory 77.8
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 96.7
52% 79.7 Pts
4-Core 97.8
8-Core 98.5
13% 98.2 Pts
64-Core 94.7
6% 94.7 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7540D
AMD(1002 9991) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.1001
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 4.15
Parallax 3.41
3% 3.85 fps
MRender 3.71
Gravity 2.93
Splatting 4.43
3% 3.69 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$23
826GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 158 177 174 154 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 31.7
Write 69.8
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 152
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A186 CMZ8GX3M2A186 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 10
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A55M-HD2 Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2 - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback