Today's hottest deals

Toshiba SATELLITE C660

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C660  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA PWWAA
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101126
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 21 '19 at 16:41
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 63
1-Core 62.1
2-Core 120
49% 81.6 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 154
21% 154 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FD3C) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2555
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.65% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.66
0% 0.74 fps
MRender 0.71
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.06 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.65%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3275GS 320GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 5.8 5.6 4 3.8 5.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Read 14
Write 5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 4.7
5% 6.55 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
53% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 44%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
1.5TB free, PID ab30
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 21 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 17.8
Write 19.3
Mixed 20
SusWrite 20.2
27% 19.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5773DH0-CH9 80AD HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.4% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 8.7
22% 7.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C660 Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C660

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback