Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu FMVNA5CE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu FMVNA5CE  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB22B
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '17 at 12:59
Run Duration284 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 87.4
1-Core 57.6
2-Core 104
54% 82.8 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 147
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 15E9) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3372
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Lighting 1.87
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.31
2% 2.06 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 3.48
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST250LT003-9YG14C 250GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0020SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 77.7
Write 78.9
Mixed 67.9
56% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.25
58% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 44%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 4GB
0GB free, PID 0165
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
5.68% Terrible
Read 24.9
Write 4.98
Mixed 5.48
11% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.96
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.02
16% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.68%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5773DH0-CH9 80AD HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback