Today's hottest deals

Asus B75M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus B75M-A  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateNov 21 '16 at 19:50
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2130
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 95.7
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 172
72% 119 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 175
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
MSI(1462 8094) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.42 fps
MRender 2.14
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.57
1% 1.52 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
584GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 155
Mixed 164
124% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.27
81% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 112%
USB DISK 3.0 Pro 64GB
54GB free, PID 5523
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 144
Write 32.9
Mixed 40
71% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 0.76
4K Mixed 0.79
110% 5.68 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 34%
Great: 34%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.84% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 6.78
Mixed 6.78
11% 9.68 MB/s
4K Read 4.65
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.005
18% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.84%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C8 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 19
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 54.8
73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-A Builds (Compare 649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B75M-A - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $432
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback