Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics75.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory59.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 26 '19 at 08:20
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 85.8
1-Core 137
2-Core 262
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 847
85% 693 Pts
64-Core 1,031
64% 1,031 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.5% Very good
Lighting 99
Reflection 107
Parallax 94.3
81% 100 fps
MRender 80.4
Gravity 89.4
Splatting 72.6
65% 80.8 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 453 462 431 415 413 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 453
Mixed 427
SusWrite 438
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 57.8
198% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 326
250% 339 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
WD Red Pro 6TB (2015)-$239
3GB free
Firmware: 0A83
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 148
Write 150
Mixed 77
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.7
174% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 122%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
10GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 18 16 18 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 60.8
Write 19.2
Mixed 26
SusWrite 16.9
23% 30.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 50%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$215
4TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 152 154 152 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 154
Write 159
Mixed 125
SusWrite 151
109% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 98%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
6GB free
Firmware: 3J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 72 73 67 74 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 92.5
Write 62.5
Mixed 26
SusWrite 70.8
46% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 57%
Lexar JumpDrive S23 USB 3.0 32GB-$30
21GB free, PID a833
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 25 25 24 24 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 35.1
Write 27
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 25.1
40% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
86% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 CMK64GX4M4A2133C13 CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 CMK64GX4M4A2133C13 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72% Very good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 22.9
72% 25 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 24
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $927
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback