HP G61 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP G61 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 306A
Memory1.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091013
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 30 '19 at 14:54
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T6600
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 30.9
2-Core 61.7
37% 53.6 Pts
4-Core 62.6
8-Core 58.8
8% 60.7 Pts
64-Core 62.5
4% 62.5 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G 103M
HP(103C 306A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.72% Terrible
Lighting 0.73
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.25
1% 0.83 fps
MRender 2.14
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1
1% 1.21 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.72%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 155
Write 118
Mixed 147
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 17.3
66% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 16.8
DQ Write 46.2
DQ Mixed 20.2
19% 27.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
Asmt 2115 64GB
60GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.7% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 29
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 29
22% 30 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 6.1
1,068% 6.57 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
14% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.07 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G61 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP G61 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback