Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '20 at 15:40
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 139
2-Core 274
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 843
83% 677 Pts
64-Core 1,087
67% 1,087 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Lighting 63.2
Reflection 66.8
Parallax 86.4
52% 72.1 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 61.2
Splatting 54.4
48% 60 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,902
Write 1,291
Mixed 485
269% 1,226 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 62.2
227% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 1210
DQ Write 1044
DQ Mixed 837
706% 1,030 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
208GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,585
Write 2,394
Mixed 1,868
508% 2,282 MB/s
4K Read 67.3
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 95.1
314% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1437
DQ Write 1222
DQ Mixed 1,301
983% 1,320 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Seagate ST3250820SV 250GB
27GB free
Firmware: 3.ACH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 44 42 45 46 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 46.7
Write 40.3
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 44.6
30% 40.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 44%
Asmt 2115 64GB
18GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.4 5.6 4.3 3.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.35% Terrible
Read 3.8
Write 3
Mixed 2.3
SusWrite 4.4
2% 3.38 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.35%
Great: 19%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 17 17 19 19 21 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 96.5
Write 36.5
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 18.6
43% 41 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
73.9% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 21
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 23.5
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,697 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,009
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback