Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C670D-10C (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON TKBSB
Memory	0.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110721
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 02 '19 at 06:46
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-240 462 User benchmarks, average bench 24% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	25.9% Poor	Memory 49.8 1-Core 14.9 2-Core 14.4 22% 26.4 Pts	4-Core 16.2 8-Core 7.4 2% 11.8 Pts	64-Core 16.3 1% 16.3 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FD74) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.87% Terrible	Lighting 1.03 Reflection 1.38 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.22 fps	MRender 1.29 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.39 1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.87% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40 17,642 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 242GB free (System drive) Firmware: ES2OA70B SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 33 26 25 37 53 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 73.1 Write 66 Mixed 33.2 SusWrite 33.4 38% 51.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B2873FHS-CH9 M471B5773DH0-CH9 3GB 167 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1333, 1333 MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	6.75% Terrible	MC Read 2.4 MC Write 1.3 MC Mixed 2.1 6% 1.93 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 0.9 3% 1.13 GB/s	Latency 161 25% 161 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.75% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM