| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG NP300E4C-AD4BR |
| Memory | 1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130625 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 05 '19 at 03:29 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
53.9%
Above average
|
63% 105 Pts
|
20% 153 Pts
|
10% 161 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C652) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2712
|
3.4%
Terrible
|
3% 3.74 fps
|
4% 4.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX002F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 85 62 60 75 78 MB/s
|
34.3%
Below average
|
40% 54.1 MB/s
|
93% 0.67 MB/s
| |
|
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
45GB free, PID 0736
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 8.8 8.8 9 9.6 9.4 MB/s
|
5.12%
Terrible
|
13% 10.4 MB/s
|
13% 1.17 MB/s
| |
|
SAMSUNG HM321HI 320GB
88GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 22 22 22 23 MB/s
|
12.6%
Very poor
|
19% 16.5 MB/s
|
56% 0.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown SH564128FJ8NZRNSDR 0194 SH564128FJ8NWRNSQR 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
55.3%
Above average
|
56% 19.4 GB/s
|
45% 15.9 GB/s
|
52% 76.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,057 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 348x |
| Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples | 152x |
| Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples | 93x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $80 |