Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180424
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateNov 05 '19 at 08:45
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 58.9
2-Core 124
53% 86.9 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 624
55% 467 Pts
64-Core 909
56% 909 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Asus(1043 83B5) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 19.9
Parallax 17.4
14% 18.2 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 17.5
Splatting 20.1
17% 20.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
409GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 390 384 395 199 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 436
Write 384
Mixed 386
SusWrite 301
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 18.1
103% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 51.2
104% 206 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC4D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 78 84 90 88 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 105
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 82.9
65% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 112%
MXT-USB Storage Device 32GB
22GB free, PID 8816
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 14 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
8.41% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 12.8
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 12.6
19% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.2
78% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.41%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Dimm0_Manufacturer lanshuo 0QB0- Dimm2_Manufacturer lanshuo 0QB0- Dimm4_Manufacturer lanshuo 0QB0- Dimm6_Manufacturer lanshuo 0QB0- 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 51.2
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 41.8
127% 44.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $92
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback