Today's hottest deals

Asus P6T DELUXE V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P6T DELUXE V2  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100921
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateNov 05 '19 at 19:12
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 128
60% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 326
34% 274 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3205) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.3% Below average
Lighting 45.9
Reflection 44
Parallax 39.3
37% 43.1 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 35.8
31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD VelociRaptor 250GB-$35
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 69 71 72 73 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 167
Write 80
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 70.8
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.6
334% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
584GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 128 144 143 145 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 170
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 140
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 114%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
214GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 73 73 74 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
45% Average
Read 83.8
Write 78.8
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 72.7
55% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
165GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 133 187 188 189 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 142
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 174
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 105%
Great: 114%
WDC WD60 EZRX-00MVLB1 6TB
435GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 71 64 62 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 65.8
Write 99.2
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 67.4
101% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 48%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
284GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 26 9.9 8.8 8.2 7.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 154
Write 124
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 16.2
107% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 61%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
94GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 7.5 0.7 0.3 0.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
21% Poor
Read 104
Write 87
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 2.5
75% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21%
Great: 60%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
61GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.9 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 182
Write 130
Mixed 66
SusWrite 0.7
109% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 16.3
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 10.9
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T DELUXE V2 Builds (Compare 1,071 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T DELUXE V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback