Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130315
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '19 at 05:24
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Memory 88.8 1-Core 95.1 2-Core 185 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 304 38% 291 Pts	64-Core 346 21% 346 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XFX(1682 9480) CLim: 1305 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.9.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Lighting 67.9 Reflection 66.7 Parallax 82.9 55% 72.5 fps	MRender 66.4 Gravity 69.9 Splatting 55.9 52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 447 273 292 293 293 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 452 Mixed 430 SusWrite 339 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 51.7 4K Mixed 39 128% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 366 276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 555GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 120 121 121 121 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Read 122 Write 116 Mixed 83.9 SusWrite 120 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0 4x4GB 117 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 15.9 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.4 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 68.7 58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	9x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	7x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	5x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	4x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	4x

SSD
120GB 120GBRescue08rm22ar120hyBench 60%, 9 samples	5x
Extreme Pro 240GBSanDisk $79Bench 92%, 10,862 samples	5x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	3x

RAM
FLFF65F-C8KL9 4x4GBKingmaxBench 49%, 72 samples	5x
M378B5273DH0 4x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 61 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 26 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $342

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16