Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 530-$45 16,724 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Memory 60.1 1-Core 56.2 2-Core 105 45% 73.8 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 173 23% 173 Pts	64-Core 176 11% 176 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 580 5,936 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Nvidia(10DE 063A) 512MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.9038 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2% Terrible	Lighting 2.13 Reflection 4.08 Parallax 0.69 2% 2.3 fps	MRender 5.05 Gravity 1.43 Splatting 2.96 2% 3.15 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43 15,932 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 20 14 23 18 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.68% Terrible	Read 10.8 Write 0.5 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 19.1 9% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 8.68% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KY996D-ELD KY996D-ELD KY996D-ELD 6GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.5% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 10.1 26% 9 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 5.9 18% 6.13 GB/s	Latency 127 31% 127 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 36%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x
Quadro FX 580NvidiaBench 2%, 5,936 samples	34x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	23x

RAM
M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 2,488 samples	24x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	10x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	5x

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $407