Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z370 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 191%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics210% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z370 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory56.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191031
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 20:54
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$160
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 125
2-Core 257
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 856
82% 675 Pts
64-Core 1,173
73% 1,173 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB; NVIDIA RTX 3080Ti FE
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
210% Outstanding
Lighting 311
Reflection 288
Parallax 325
253% 308 fps
MRender 344
Gravity 253
Splatting 188
206% 262 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 210%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$104
799GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 388 391 397 400 400 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 378
Write 400
Mixed 370
SusWrite 394
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 62.5
204% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 250
188% 252 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 114%
Great: 137%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 356 354 356 355 353 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 488
Mixed 454
SusWrite 362
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 65.2
220% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 127%
Great: 129%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$104
12GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 517
Write 275
Mixed 314
81% 369 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 61.6
219% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 344
250% 329 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
Adata SX8100NP 1TB
925GB free
Firmware: VB411D39
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1351 1357 1357 1357 1357 1356 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2,651
Write 1,352
Mixed 1,287
SusWrite 1,356
369% 1,661 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 71.5
238% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,144
DQ Write 825
DQ Mixed 1,001
743% 990 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 307%
Great: 336%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
123GB free
Firmware: CC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 102 102 103 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 64
SusWrite 102
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
653GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 123 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 183
Write 171
Mixed 108
SusWrite 122
108% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C16-16GVRB 04CD F4-3200C16-16GVK 04CD F4-3000C16-16GVRB 04CD F4-3200C16-16GVK 64GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 27.6
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 32.8
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 3,570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Extreme4 - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $761
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback