Acer Predator G9-793

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator G9-793  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Challenger2_SKS
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170626
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 08 '19 at 05:16
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 201
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 563
56% 454 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1177) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.8% Very good
Lighting 90.5
Reflection 112
Parallax 94.6
74% 99 fps
MRender 91.4
Gravity 89
Splatting 98.5
77% 93 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57XA4104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 752 681 679 736 661 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,226
Write 986
Mixed 738
SusWrite 611
199% 890 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 56.3
200% 74 MB/s
DQ Read 812
DQ Write 748
DQ Mixed 492
448% 684 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 183%
Great: 207%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 2TB
953GB free
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 437 439 460 461 465 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 447
Mixed 363
SusWrite 450
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 36.5
134% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 296
239% 337 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
884GB free
Firmware: AX1P5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 113 114 115 114 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 114
Write 112
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 114
68% 94 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.1% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 25.4
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 21.1
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G9-793 Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Acer Predator G9-793

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback