Today's hottest deals

Huanan X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory44GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 44GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardHuanan X79  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 44 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170217
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 08 '19 at 18:24
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 71.1
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 148
55% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 518
49% 404 Pts
64-Core 755
47% 755 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 19.7
18% 19.3 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 22
Splatting 16.6
17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
D3-120 120GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T161118b
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 240
Write 369
Mixed 218
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 19.5
78% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 76.3
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 58.6
60% 94.8 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 71%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
42GB free
Firmware: HP34
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 64.5
Write 63.3
Mixed 46
43% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 58%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
180GB free
Firmware: 0105
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 99.8
Write 95.7
Mixed 61
64% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 58%
JMicron Generic DISK01 320GB
285GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 98.2
Write 96
Mixed 62
106% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
108% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 30%
JMicron Generic DISK00 500GB
106GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 88.3
Write 89.8
Mixed 57.3
98% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 28%
JMicron Generic DISK00 500GB
58GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38.5
Write 84
Mixed 42.7
76% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 51%
JMicron Generic DISK01 320GB
240GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 104
Write 107
Mixed 55.7
110% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 31%
Generic MassStorageClass 32GB
29GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 26.3
Write 13.3
Mixed 20.2
24% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.4
94% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B4G70EMB- M393B5170EH1- M393B5170EH1- M393B5170EH1- 43GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
32767, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.8% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6
18% 6.43 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 5.9
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Huanan X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $147
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback