Asrock AM1H-ITX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsrock AM1H-ITX  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140219
Uptime49.6 Days
Run DateNov 27 '16 at 10:39
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 3850 APU R3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Memory 51.3
1-Core 20.3
2-Core 40.6
26% 37.4 Pts
4-Core 79.6
8-Core 80.4
11% 80 Pts
64-Core 82
5% 82 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8280
ASRock(1849 9836) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.1001
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.65% Terrible
Lighting 1.67
Reflection 3.73
Parallax 1.25
1% 2.22 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.57
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.66 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.65%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 452
Write 336
Mixed 375
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 12.5
67% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 30.7
DQ Mixed 12.3
14% 23 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 115%
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50
260GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10003 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 68.4
Write 73.3
Mixed 71.5
54% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.29
76% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0. 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AM1H-ITX Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock AM1H-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $226
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback