Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 105% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	98.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI (all builds)
Memory	20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190703
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 10 '19 at 00:54
Run Duration	265 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Memory 68.6 1-Core 148 2-Core 298 90% 172 Pts	4-Core 592 8-Core 1,160 104% 876 Pts	64-Core 2,094 130% 2,094 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% MSI(1462 C307) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	98.6% Outstanding	Lighting 127 Reflection 139 Parallax 129 104% 132 fps	MRender 97.8 Gravity 123 Splatting 106 89% 109 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1555 1521 1515 1518 1515 1522 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	323% Outstanding	Read 2,510 Write 1,742 Mixed 1,629 SusWrite 1,524 414% 1,852 MB/s	4K Read 63.3 4K Write 136 4K Mixed 84.4 276% 94.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1180 DQ Write 762 DQ Mixed 938 708% 960 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 323% Great: 435%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 4.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 162 171 171 171 166 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Read 134 Write 149 Mixed 68.3 SusWrite 167 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.6 228% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87 14,331 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 5.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 167 173 172 168 171 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 87%
ST8000VN 0022-2EL112 8TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 4.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 119 119 120 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Read 176 Write 170 Mixed 94.3 SusWrite 119 183% 140 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 1.1 221% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 77%
ST12000V N0008-2JH101 12TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 7.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 119 119 120 119 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Read 214 Write 216 Mixed 147 SusWrite 119 229% 174 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.6 325% 9.6 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 79%
ST12000V N0008-2JH101 12TB 8.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 120 120 119 117 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	78.6% Very good	Read 222 Write 210 Mixed 147 SusWrite 118 228% 174 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 1.4 300% 9.27 MB/s

SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 29GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 10 9.2 7.7 10 8.6 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 26.7 Write 18 Mixed 16 SusWrite 10.2 22% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 2.5 213% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 18%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 772GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 120 120 119 117 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Read 192 Write 156 Mixed 81.1 SusWrite 118 175% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 1,417 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.8% Good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 24.6 MC Mixed 25.1 73% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 23.6 58% 20.3 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI Builds (Compare 6,628 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,275x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $151Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,044x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	960x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	656x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	614x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $499Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	416x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	446x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	294x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	226x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	235x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	193x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	137x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $922

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16