Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire M5910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire M5910  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M5910
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '19 at 15:49
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 94.3
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 164
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 357
43% 331 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 25.9
Parallax 35.3
29% 32.2 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 33.2
Splatting 32.7
28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$31
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0624AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 77 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.2% Average
Read 240
Write 230
Mixed 221
SusWrite 81.8
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 23.4
79% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 175
132% 177 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 93%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$88
358GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 68 70 70 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 108
Write 110
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 70
64% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 74%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050V -63 500GB
8GB free
Firmware: AX0A1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 71 83 76 72 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 82
Write 81.8
Mixed 38
SusWrite 73.8
50% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 64%
ST310005 20AS 1TB
113GB free, PID 102a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 23.5
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 24.9
33% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5773CH0-CH9 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
34.1% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.7
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M5910 Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback