Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W280  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2912-A1
Memory0.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100818
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateDec 10 '21 at 09:08
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 81
2-Core 149
66% 107 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 354
37% 297 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 580
Nvidia(10DE 063A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.61% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 0.3
1% 1.3 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.61%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 500GB (2012)
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 68.1
Mixed 53
46% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
100% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 79%
IT1167B USB Flash Disk 2GB
1GB free, PID 1167
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 7 6.9 6.9 6.9 7 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
4.84% Terrible
Read 23
Write 7
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 6.8
12% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.84%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5773CH0-CH9 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.3% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W280 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $123
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback