Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '19 at 03:02
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 174
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 330
41% 311 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Asus(1043 048F) 2GB
CLim: 1188 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24% Poor
Lighting 28.4
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 34.3
23% 31.7 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 27.7
Splatting 34.9
26% 30.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 178 76 37 36 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 346
Write 330
Mixed 297
SusWrite 96.5
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 32.9
108% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 53.3
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 90.4
80% 116 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 118%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$99
436GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 83 83 85 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 109
Write 59.1
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 83
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 88%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 133 136 135 134 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 140
Write 81.8
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 132
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 83%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$99
1TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 37 33 35 33 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 23.8
Write 44.8
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 34.5
22% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 88%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
515GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 103 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 103
Write 95
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 102
68% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 86%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$99
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 115 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 77.1
Write 54.7
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 113
57% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 88%
ICYBOX IB3664SU3 DISK01 2TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 99 100 100 100 98 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.5% Average
Read 103
Write 100
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 97.2
126% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 43%
ICYBOX IB3664SU3 DISK02 4TB
541GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 1 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.2% Very poor
Read 96.8
Write 97.2
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 0.8
71% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
72% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 18%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
594GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 23 24 24 24 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 32
Write 26.8
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 22.7
36% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 38%
ICYBOX IB3664SU3 DISK03 2TB
711GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 1.9 1.6 1.2 0.6 3.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.6% Poor
Read 143
Write 133
Mixed 99.7
SusWrite 2.3
118% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
120% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 37%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
401GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2.9 3.1 3 3 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 30
Write 24.3
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 3.5
26% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12%
Great: 61%
WDC WD30 EZRX-22D8PB0 3TB
1TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0 0 0.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.1% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 25
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 0.1
25% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 21%
ICYBOX IB3664SU3 DISK00 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 101 101 100 99 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.7% Average
Read 96.9
Write 94.3
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 99.4
126% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.3
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $531
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback