Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z77-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '22 at 00:45
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 93.9
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 191
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 363
48% 362 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.3% Above average
Lighting 70.6
Reflection 76.3
Parallax 69.9
58% 72.3 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 72.2
Splatting 68.8
57% 69.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 83 77 94 96 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 360
Write 339
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 111
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 10.7
44% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 65.1
DQ Write 31.1
DQ Mixed 33.3
29% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
159GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 111 111 109 115 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 102
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 108
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 69%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 108 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 117
Write 111
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 108
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 77%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$54
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 181 186 187 183 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 183
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 180
100% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.6% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 59.9
67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-M Builds (Compare 1,320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $439
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback