Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	83.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190410
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '19 at 18:10
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$263 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Memory 91.2 1-Core 117 2-Core 234 83% 147 Pts	4-Core 466 8-Core 879 80% 672 Pts	64-Core 895 55% 895 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83.1% Excellent	Lighting 93.5 Reflection 124 Parallax 103 76% 107 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 136 Splatting 111 97% 119 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GB 9,460 User benchmarks, average bench 198% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3L1QEXH7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 579 612 400 401 399 401 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	142% Outstanding	Read 658 Write 592 Mixed 598 SusWrite 465 130% 578 MB/s	4K Read 56 4K Write 90.9 4K Mixed 43.3 188% 63.4 MB/s	DQ Read 700 DQ Write 684 DQ Mixed 1,100 714% 828 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 264%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 926GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 199 197 199 199 195 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 204 Write 186 Mixed 85.5 SusWrite 198 123% 168 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 113%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB 1,760 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 42GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 26 25 28 28 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 17.7 Write 27 Mixed 9 SusWrite 25.7 28% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.8 126% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x16GB 2,191 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	MC Read 10 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 10.8 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 7.7 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 150%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 139%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,513x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,326x
RTX 2080Nvidia $389Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	1,133x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,363x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	1,052x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	807x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	747x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	589x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	527x

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16