Today's hottest deals

To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics61.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '19 at 10:07
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 71.1
2-Core 158
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 470
47% 380 Pts
64-Core 565
35% 565 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.5% Good
Lighting 76.1
Reflection 79.1
Parallax 75.8
62% 77 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 72
Splatting 76.2
60% 73.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEBKF128G7 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PBF114N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 183 69 53 61 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 562
Write 297
Mixed 377
SusWrite 103
74% 335 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 35.8
128% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 155
134% 194 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
44GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 56 80 46 51 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 86.5
Write 49.2
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 55.2
40% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.5
200% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 88%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB
4GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 16 19 15 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.91% Terrible
Read 14.8
Write 27.4
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 16.5
27% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.91%
Great: 22%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
0GB free, PID 0718
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 28.5
Write 23.3
Mixed 22.3
31% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
40% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 17%
SSK HE-G3000 2TB
130GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 22 21 22 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 25.1
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 21.2
34% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965433-153.A 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13.1
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.6
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback