Today's hottest deals

Intel X79G-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X79G-A  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '24 at 11:56
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 68.6
2-Core 137
58% 94.9 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 420
42% 343 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1295 MHz, MLim: 1803 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.7.1
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
44.2% Average
Lighting 54.3
Reflection 57.2
Parallax 77.1
44% 62.9 fps
MRender 59
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 44.8
44% 55.1 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Husky 128GB 128GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2109XKR
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 421
Write 370
Mixed 343
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 25.4
89% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 177
136% 182 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
202GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 108 107 106 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 167
Write 170
Mixed 116
SusWrite 107
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965433-153.A 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 17.1
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 9.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 75 21.5" 1280 720 IPS2150 21.5HQ-LED
Typical X79G-A Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Intel X79G-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $131
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback