Today's hottest deals

Lenovo QAWGE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo QAWGE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo IdeaPad G485
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '22 at 02:56
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-70 APU (2012 M.Za)
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Memory 25
1-Core 11.5
2-Core 17.6
13% 18 Pts
4-Core 24.9
8-Core 25.1
3% 25 Pts
64-Core 26.6
2% 26.6 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7290
Legend(17AA 397F) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.47% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.4
1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.47%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Husky 128GB 128GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R025N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 206 203 302 187 159 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 268
Write 288
Mixed 263
SusWrite 215
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 9.5
33% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 70
DQ Write 59.6
DQ Mixed 58.2
45% 62.6 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HB3SU002GFM8MML16 HB3SU002GFM8MMC16 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.12% Terrible
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 3.4
8% 2.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 2.6
6% 2.23 GB/s
Latency 286
14% 286 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical QAWGE Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo QAWGE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback