Today's hottest deals

Semp STI NA 1401

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemSemp STI NA 1401  (all builds)
MotherboardSemp STI NA 1401
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130313
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 20:32
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-70 APU (2012 M.Za)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
22.3% Poor
Memory 40.9
1-Core 12.5
2-Core 23.9
19% 25.8 Pts
4-Core 24.1
8-Core 24.2
3% 24.2 Pts
64-Core 24.3
2% 24.3 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7290
Device(1297 2023) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
0.86% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1
1% 1.13 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.86%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$25
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 52 42 39 75 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 69.6
Write 70.4
Mixed 44.6
SusWrite 53.5
44% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown A1_ 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.7
10% 3.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 3
7% 2.6 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STI NA 1401 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Semp STI NA 1401

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback