Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD C-70 APU (2012 M.Za) 922 User benchmarks, average bench 22% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Memory 20 1-Core 8.8 2-Core 11.9 10% 13.6 Pts	4-Core 15.8 8-Core 16.3 2% 16 Pts	64-Core 16.7 1% 16.7 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7290 821 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1297 2023) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.48% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 0.4 1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.48% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon LCH-256V2S 256GB 2,710 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: WC87903 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 167 92 155 177 185 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.5% Below average	Read 267 Write 191 Mixed 195 SusWrite 150 45% 201 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 12.3 4K Mixed 9.7 36% 11 MB/s	DQ Read 48.2 DQ Write 28.2 DQ Mixed 23.7 22% 33.4 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown A1_ 1x8GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.88% Terrible	MC Read 2.9 MC Write 2.2 MC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.77 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 1.2 SC Mixed 1.7 4% 1.5 GB/s	Latency 321 12% 321 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 7.88% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 12%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
C-70 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 22%, 922 samples	2x
C-60 APUAMDBench 23%, 2,297 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 7290AMDBench 1%, 821 samples	2x
Radeon HD 6290AMDBench 1%, 2,442 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
A1_ 1x2GBUnknownBench 9%, 73 samples	2x
A1_ 1x4GBUnknownBench 14%, 324 samples	2x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16