Today's hottest deals

MSI B450 Tomahawk

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 Tomahawk  (all builds)
Memory18.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190924
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 28 '19 at 04:54
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 229
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 664
66% 539 Pts
64-Core 848
52% 848 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 118
Parallax 121
102% 121 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 121
Splatting 95.2
102% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 445 461 432 350 353 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 477
Mixed 425
SusWrite 414
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 54.6
172% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 368
276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 116%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 114 114 117 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 129
Write 140
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 114
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 96%
WD Elements 25A2 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 109 108 109 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 122
Write 106
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 108
141% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.6
279% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 Kingston KHX2133C14/8G 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.1% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 20.1
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 20.8
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 7,544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $512
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback