Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5675 8,072 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 93.5 1-Core 76.6 2-Core 153 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 489 49% 399 Pts	64-Core 556 34% 556 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620 17,163 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Elitegroup(1019 1016) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.22% Terrible	Lighting 2.67 Reflection 3.04 Parallax 1.44 2% 2.38 fps	MRender 3.38 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.84 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.22% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 180 184 184 187 215 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.3% Average	Read 212 Write 155 Mixed 159 SusWrite 194 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 34.3 4K Mixed 21.4 80% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 54.6 DQ Write 56.8 DQ Mixed 48.9 39% 53.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 100%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.1 2.1 2.8 2.4 2.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	4.25% Terrible	Read 19.2 Write 2 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 2.7 7% 7.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.25% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ST M25P80 37GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 4266, 33 MHz 4096, 33792 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	42.5% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 13.6 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 10.3 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 61.1 66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

RAM
ST M25P80 41GBUnknownBench 37%, 69 samples	20x
M25P80 1x33GBSTBench 22%, 14 samples	3x
ST M25P80 37GBUnknownBench 36%, 25 samples	2x

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $155

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16