MSI H270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A62
MotherboardMSI H270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '19 at 15:56
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$229
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 140
2-Core 269
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 593
60% 486 Pts
64-Core 660
41% 660 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 114
Parallax 98.4
91% 108 fps
MRender 98.6
Gravity 102
Splatting 102
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 53 51 153 79 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 398
Write 44
Mixed 91.4
SusWrite 92.6
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 12.2
59% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 24.4
DQ Write 27.9
DQ Mixed 24.9
19% 25.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
819GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 202 196 201 198 199 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 167
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 195
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FD 859B BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FBD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.8% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 20.8
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 22.2
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) Builds (Compare 924 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI H270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $578
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback