HP EliteOne 800 G2 23-in Touch AiO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteOne 800 G2 23-in Touch AiO  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8058
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '19 at 10:06
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 220
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 420
57% 424 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 8058) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4551
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.07% Terrible
Lighting 6.33
Reflection 8.69
Parallax 6.44
5% 7.15 fps
MRender 7.24
Gravity 5.43
Splatting 14.1
8% 8.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.07%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1C2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 183 192 182 182 188 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 324
Write 323
Mixed 313
SusWrite 204
66% 291 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 37.4
138% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 182
161% 239 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
459GB free
Firmware: 0002YXM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 134 134 132 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 134
Write 128
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 133
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-023.A00G Samsung M471A5143DB0-CPB 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.4% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 11.9
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteOne 800 G2 23-in Touch AiO Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteOne 800 G2 23-in Touch AiO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $67
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $419
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback