TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Predator G3-572

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator G3-572  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sienta_KLS
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171226
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateDec 04 '19 at 10:28
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 76.1
2-Core 153
57% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 265
36% 265 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 56.8%
 Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 118A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.69% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 4.03
4% 6.74 fps
MRender 9.67
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 9.26
7% 8.11 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 4.69%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 123 111 126 123 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 420
Write 126
Mixed 152
SusWrite 118
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 20.5
76% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 103
109% 188 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 57.6%
 Great: 70%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
622GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 107 110 100 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 147
Write 132
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 112
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
212% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 74.5%
 Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 029E CMSX8GX4M1A2666C18 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.3% Above average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 15.7
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 12.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 50.3%
 Great: 77%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Predator G3-572 Builds (Compare 1,413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G3-572

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples1,065x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples348x
GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples764x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples447x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples202x
SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples346x
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel  $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples182x
RBUSNS8180DS3128GH 128GBKingstonBench 58%, 4,820 samples65x
RAM
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 40%, 22,543 samples157x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples125x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 1x8GBMicronBench 36%, 24,227 samples76x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback