Asus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DY
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190903
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateDec 05 '19 at 12:14
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 218
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 619
65% 519 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 17C1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.10.22
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.1
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 20.4
13% 17.7 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 20.5
14% 16.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 423 425 425 426 426 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 781
Write 675
Mixed 700
SusWrite 433
145% 647 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 61.9
208% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 852
DQ Write 713
DQ Mixed 726
560% 764 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 157%
Great: 187%
APS-SL3N-512 512GB
129GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 422 192 109 105 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44% Average
Read 317
Write 114
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 229
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 21.2
4K Mixed 12.1
56% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 14.8
DQ Write 16.1
DQ Mixed 15.5
12% 15.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Kingston ACR26D4S9S1ME-4 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 20.8
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 20.3
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY Builds (Compare 586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback