Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 06 '16 at 21:01
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2310-$90
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 94.5
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 190
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 369
49% 369 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT
XFX(1682 2305) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 332.21
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
0.95% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 0.38
1% 1 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.78
1% 1.78 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.95%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
821GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 115
Write 127
Mixed 108
88% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.99
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.34
120% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 99P5471-002.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.7% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 11
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.8
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 58.6
68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 395 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback