Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH67BL
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180412
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 07 '22 at 15:14
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2310-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 57.4
1-Core 75.8
2-Core 149
53% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 266
34% 258 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8586) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.9% Poor
Lighting 27.7
Reflection 34.2
Parallax 27.2
23% 29.7 fps
MRender 35
Gravity 28.1
Splatting 25.2
24% 29.4 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$23
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 6 2 223 67 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 433
Write 343
Mixed 351
SusWrite 106
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 9.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$112
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 10,065
Mixed 77.1
3,627% 5,071 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.4
193% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$112
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 151 155 152 154 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 73.3
Write 131
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 154
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
199% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD380D81-1333C 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 136
30% 136 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,004 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback